How do you come up with those numbers for a car that is a year older than yours and also has under 10K original miles?... incorrect dash plaque notwithstanding. Have McLarens not bottomed out yet?
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "Sandy Block" <cigarsandy@c...> wrote: > The '89 is the one to go with. It's in better than excellent > condition, however, it's overpriced at $21,500.00. I paid $20,000 > for my '90 a year ago with 7,237 miles on it, out of a museum in > Vermont. This '89 with the 8,000 miles is worth like $17,800 to > $18,200. The dash plaque number is also incorrect. I'll go check it > & see waht number it really was, and post it. > > S A N D Y