5010
<<
Message Index
>>
5012
Number: 5011
From: Troy Allan Hobbs
Date: Mon May 10, 2004 8:47 pm
Subject: Re: [ASC McLaren ] Re: trivia
Body:
Re: [ASC McLaren ] Re: trivia
|
|
If my memory serves, in 88 the cars went to mass air, but also that was about the time crash renforcements were required in car doors, so that may be why the weight differences.
Troy
ecstacycustomz <ecstacycustomz@yahoo.com> wrote:
weights of all years
1984 coupe--3063, 84 rag--3124, 85 coupe--3113, 85 rag--3165, 86
coupe--3189, 86 rag--3269, 87-3214, 88--3341, 89--3333, 90--3327
thats 127lbs difference from 87 to 88. seems very odd to me.. these
weights are non option weight. but less thatn 20lbs difference for
all other year mustang asc's.. so i guess my original question
should have been why did the 87 weight so much less? there was 104
lbs difference from 85 to 86, this was probably due to the addition
of the fuel injection and other engine changes in the capri. but im
still baffled by the stang numbers.... anyone anyone
jdawg
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "Sandy Block" <cigarsandy@c...>
wrote:
> I don't know that it is. I have never seen any weight figures
> released from ASCMcLaren on the weights between the years, but it
> would seem that they'd all be within say 20 pounds of each other.
> I'd say that the Recaro Seat Option in 1987/1988 might be good for
an
> additional 10 pounds (5 per side); but other than that, I
personally
> don't know of any reason. What did you find out???
>
>
>
>
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "ecstacycustomz"
> <ecstacycustomz@y...> wrote:
> > ok who can answer this....
> > why is the 88 asc heavier than any other year asc? coming in at
> > 3341 lbs?????
> > jdawg
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs