2295    <<    Message Index    >>    2297
Number: 2296
From: "negusm" <negusm@y...>
Date: Wed Apr 9, 2003  6:09 pm
Subject: Re: Sorry, to bring this up again....

Body:
I was not directing it at you Sandy, I know you may not know, thats
why you haven't posted. I know if you knew you would be the first
one to reply. I was hoping that somebody who had an 1985 or 1986 car
with an original radio could tell me one way or the other how their
radio is setup.

Since I have nothing to go by any comment/help is appreciated. I
just hate to get a $150 radio from Hank and have no way to mount it.
I'm just trying to get back to stock if I can....I thought I was
almost there.

-Mike



--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "Sandy Block" <cigarsandy@c...>
wrote:
>

--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "negusm" <negusm@y...> wrote:
> > This bugs me...
> >
> I am not ignoring you, I just do NOT know the answer, Sorry
>
>
>
>
> So as you may or may not know...I sent the Alpine radio back to
Hank
> > to get changed to the Kenwood since I thought my car was an
> early '85
> > which it may not, the Alpine may be more correct for me...
> >
> > ...but anyways...I called Hank asking for the face plate (trim
> plate)
> > for the radio. The Alpine he sent looked just like the asc
> > Brochure...it has posts (dual shaft)...but it didn't come with a
> face
> > plate panel. The dash in my car which I believe is totally
> original
> > is a DIN-style which was new for 1985 and went to 1986. It has a
> > wide opening and won't support a post style radio without at
least
> > some trim plate or something.
> >
> > My question is, was there a DIN style radio that I should ask
Hank
> > for, or was there a face plate used in the DIN opening for the
dual
> > shaft radio?
> >
> > -Mike

  Replies Name/Email Yahoo! ID Date Size
2297 Re: Sorry, to bring this up again.... jdawg ecstacycustomz2000 Wed  4/9/2003   4 KB
2301 Re: Sorry, to bring this up again.... negusm negusm Wed  4/9/2003   5 KB