2418
<<
Message Index
>>
2420
Number: 2419
From: "jdawg" <jdawg@e...>
Date: Sun Apr 20, 2003 10:07 am
Subject: Re: 22k 1990 asc ebay
Body:
ok so i have no idea what im talking about...lol did they switch
mfg. of the top or something, i cant imagine anyone saying" hey
lets add several gaudy seams, it will make the lines of the car much
smoother". maybe they were trying to save maney at that point or
something.
jdawg
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "Sandy Block" <cigarsandy@c...>
wrote:
> Okay. I missed all of this - out all day.
>
> 1. The top is 100% correct & original. It's the style top used
in
> 89 & 90.
>
> 2. I scanned the photos for 15 minutes. I cannot find a single
> thing wrong on the car (excluding engine....next). The interior
> (note, it has the Whistler built in Radar) is flawless, likewise
the
> body & roof.
>
> 3. I'd wanna talk to the owner regarding the date on the photos &
> the condition NOW.
>
> 4. It is VIN 132915, making it the 2nd from the last unit made
for
> 1990. (132854 thru 132918). The dash plaque of # 280 is in error
> (as so many are). It should really be # 296.
>
> 5. The engine looks odd to me. I printed the photo and am going
> down to compared it to my car. Will post results within 30
minutes.
>
> 6. History of car:- I found the car 7 years ago in OHIO, so
there's
> agood chance it might still be the original owner. In 1996 the
car
> had 13,000 miles on it. So, the mileage is more than likely
legit.
> 13,000 when it was 6 years old would stand to reason the be 23,000
at
> 13 years old, right?
>
> 7. Off to check engine. Whatever....I would want to know what
all
> that slop gold color is for..... Will post agin, soon!
>
>
>
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "jdawg" <jdawg@e...> wrote:
> > its also a MCLA"RON"!!!!
> > O is nowhere near E on a keyboard. lol
> > jdawg
> > it is however a '90, 33rd of '90 at that. how many were like
it
> of
> > the 65 sandy, do tell.
> >
> >
> >
> >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "jdawg" <jdawg@e...> wrote:
> > > my camera has the correct time and date, i never set it or
know
> > of
> > > a setting, it corrects for daylight savings and all????
> > > the engine compartment looks like they coated it with spray
glue
> > > then drove through a dust storm. the top is not factory. it
has
> > > seams front to back on the top and diagonal seams on the
sides.
> a
> > > true top is one piece on the very top and has no seam on the
> > side.
> > > 23,000 miles??????
> > > jdawg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, tasmaniac1 <no_reply@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if that were the case with a standard digital
camera
> > > > wouldn't he be changing the date on a daily basis, even with
a
> > > > lithium battery? Back up batterries should last at least 3-5
> > years
> > > > for a date time group. Given the benefit of doubt if I were
the
> > > > person, unselect the date insertion to cause less confusion
or
> > > > scrutiny. I'd still suggest newer pictures if anyone is
> > interested.
> > > >
> > > > -Nick
> > > >
> > > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "negusm" <negusm@y...>
wrote:
> > > > > The date on the pics doesn't mean much. Some cameras
reset
> > the
> > > > date
> > > > > when you change or run out of batteries. He should have
> > stated
> > > it
> > > > in
> > > > > his add though if that was the case.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, tasmaniac1
<no_reply@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Just looks dirty on the sides under the hood. What gets
me
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > > pictures are almost 3 1/2 years old. What does it look
like
> > > now?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Nick
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "negusm"
<negusm@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
> > > > > > > ViewItem&item=2411691571&category=6236
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is it me or is the engine compartment a bit odd?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Mike