2374
<<
Message Index
>>
2376
Number: 2375
From: "Sandy Block" <cigarsandy@c...>
Date: Thu Apr 17, 2003 6:20 pm
Subject: Re: 22k 1990 asc ebay
Body:
Okay. I missed all of this - out all day.
1. The top is 100% correct & original. It's the style top used in
89 & 90.
2. I scanned the photos for 15 minutes. I cannot find a single
thing wrong on the car (excluding engine....next). The interior
(note, it has the Whistler built in Radar) is flawless, likewise the
body & roof.
3. I'd wanna talk to the owner regarding the date on the photos &
the condition NOW.
4. It is VIN 132915, making it the 2nd from the last unit made for
1990. (132854 thru 132918). The dash plaque of # 280 is in error
(as so many are). It should really be # 296.
5. The engine looks odd to me. I printed the photo and am going
down to compared it to my car. Will post results within 30 minutes.
6. History of car:- I found the car 7 years ago in OHIO, so there's
agood chance it might still be the original owner. In 1996 the car
had 13,000 miles on it. So, the mileage is more than likely legit.
13,000 when it was 6 years old would stand to reason the be 23,000 at
13 years old, right?
7. Off to check engine. Whatever....I would want to know what all
that slop gold color is for..... Will post agin, soon!
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "jdawg" <jdawg@e...> wrote:
> its also a MCLA"RON"!!!!
> O is nowhere near E on a keyboard. lol
> jdawg
> it is however a '90, 33rd of '90 at that. how many were like it
of
> the 65 sandy, do tell.
>
>
>
>
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "jdawg" <jdawg@e...> wrote:
> > my camera has the correct time and date, i never set it or know
> of
> > a setting, it corrects for daylight savings and all????
> > the engine compartment looks like they coated it with spray glue
> > then drove through a dust storm. the top is not factory. it has
> > seams front to back on the top and diagonal seams on the sides.
a
> > true top is one piece on the very top and has no seam on the
> side.
> > 23,000 miles??????
> > jdawg
> >
> >
> >
> >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, tasmaniac1 <no_reply@y...>
> wrote:
> > > Mike,
> > >
> > > I wonder if that were the case with a standard digital camera
> > > wouldn't he be changing the date on a daily basis, even with a
> > > lithium battery? Back up batterries should last at least 3-5
> years
> > > for a date time group. Given the benefit of doubt if I were the
> > > person, unselect the date insertion to cause less confusion or
> > > scrutiny. I'd still suggest newer pictures if anyone is
> interested.
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > >
> > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "negusm" <negusm@y...> wrote:
> > > > The date on the pics doesn't mean much. Some cameras reset
> the
> > > date
> > > > when you change or run out of batteries. He should have
> stated
> > it
> > > in
> > > > his add though if that was the case.
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > >
> > > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, tasmaniac1 <no_reply@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Just looks dirty on the sides under the hood. What gets me
> is
> > > the
> > > > > pictures are almost 3 1/2 years old. What does it look like
> > now?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Nick
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
--- In ascmclaren@yahoogroups.com, "negusm" <negusm@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
> > > > > > ViewItem&item=2411691571&category=6236
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it me or is the engine compartment a bit odd?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Mike